An alert is open and someone has to decide whether it requires a suspicious activity report (SAR). AMS assesses the case, prepares and files the report with your FIU — supporting fintech, crypto, CASP/VASP, EMI and payment firms.
Our regulatory reporting and SAR filing services cover the full process: a documented filing decision, report preparation, secure submission and follow-up communication with the authority. Whether your framework uses a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR), Suspicious Transaction Report (STR) or another local reporting form, we help you act without undue delay and keep a clear record of the decision. We agree the scope and turnaround before we start.
SAR cases often require a prompt, well-documented decision. When a filing obligation arises, delays or gaps in the record can quickly become a regulatory issue.
Not every alert creates a filing obligation. We assess the facts, KYC information and risk context, document the decision and determine whether the case should be reported to the FIU.
We prepare the suspicious activity report, structure the suspicion narrative and supporting information, and make sure the case is ready for secure submission through the approved reporting channel.
Crypto, fintech, CASP/VASP, EMI and payment cases can involve multiple counterparties, wallets and transaction flows. We turn that complexity into a clear case that a regulator can follow.
End-to-end suspicious activity reporting support — from case assessment and report preparation to secure FIU submission and post-filing records.
The service includes:
Need support beyond regulatory reporting? AMS can help you build, strengthen and maintain the wider AML framework with:
Practical guidance on AML requirements and compliance decisions
Risk-based AML policies and procedures tailored to your business
Ongoing AML oversight and support from an appointed specialist
Independent review of AML controls and regulatory readiness
Role-based AML training for employees and management teams
Explore our full range of AML compliance services and support
Our specialists assess borderline cases for fintech, crypto, EMI and payment firms. You get a reasoned, documented conclusion.
Send us the transaction details and the alert or risk signal
We will assess whether a SAR filing obligation is triggered, identify any missing information and tell you if filing is not required.
We review the facts and context before a SAR is filed, helping you determine whether a reporting obligation actually arises and avoid unnecessary filings based on false positives.
We prepare the report, arrange secure submission to the competent FIU and maintain the supporting rationale, audit trail and follow-up records needed for regulatory review.
We work with crypto, CASP/VASP, EMI and payment businesses, where wallet exposure, counterparties and complex transaction flows often require a more specialised approach to the report.
You share the alert, transaction data, KYC/KYB records and internal notes. We review the facts, identify any gaps and determine whether a SAR filing obligation arises.
If filing is required, we prepare the suspicious activity report with the relevant client information, transaction details, suspicion rationale, risk classification and supporting documentation.
We submit the SAR through the approved reporting channel, retain submission confirmation and organise the supporting records for your compliance file.
If the FIU requests clarification or additional documents, we support the response and keep the audit trail complete throughout the follow-up.
We work to the standard the FIU expects: a structured narrative, complete records and a filing decision you can stand behind.
Where a SAR filing obligation arises, action may be required without undue delay
Send us the case and we will take it from assessment to secure submission, with the turnaround agreed before we start.
You submit a SAR through the secure channel that the competent FIU approves. Depending on the jurisdiction, this may be goAML, a national reporting portal or another authenticated system. Regular email is never permitted, because of confidentiality requirements. AMS confirms the correct channel and handles the submission.
Not every alert creates a SAR filing obligation. We assess the facts, KYC information and risk context to determine whether you need to report the case and document the decision. See our step-by-step guide for more on how to file a SAR.
The FIU may accept the report without further action or ask for clarification or additional documents. AMS supports the follow-up, organises the submission confirmation and keeps the decision rationale and supporting records complete.
Tipping-off restrictions limit what you can disclose about a report or related investigation. We help you document the case and manage communications in line with the applicable confidentiality requirements.
The applicable regulatory framework determines who takes responsibility for internal escalation and external reporting. Many obliged entities assign this role to an AML Officer or MLRO. For ongoing support, see our outsourced AML Officer and MLRO service.
We prioritise urgent cases. Once we receive the key facts and documents, we agree the turnaround before starting and work toward a documented filing decision without undue delay.
Systems can automate parts of the process, including monitoring, alerts and case management. Human judgement still drives the filing decision and the suspicion narrative. AMS provides the assessment, preparation and filing support rather than SAR filing software.
AMS can handle the assessment, report preparation, secure submission and supporting documentation. The obliged entity and the responsible persons under the applicable rules retain the underlying regulatory responsibility.
Yes. We support obliged entities in the EU, Switzerland, the UAE, Canada, Singapore, El Salvador, Panama and other jurisdictions. The reporting obligation, the deadline and the filing channel differ by country, so we confirm the applicable framework and the competent FIU before the case is assessed.